Coming Soon

Q: What is your MPPs duty, role and responsibility?

A: To protect the interests of the people residing in his or her constituency.

Q: Who does your MPP hold a Fiduciary Duty to, the constiuency or the political party?

A; The MPP has and holds a Fiduciary Duty to his or her constituency.

It would seem the reason unjust laws remain in effect, is we forgot how to challenge them.

Maybe it’s time to learn or re-learn how.

While there are those who do try writing their MPP from time to time, most do eo to complain about how things are operating. It would seem most have lost sight of the MPPs job, which is to make law, not adminster it.

Would you not instruct your lawyer or Realtor on what you want done within reason? If the lawyer or Realtor was not following through with your direction and causing harm, would you not set them straight and demand they fix it, that is if you didn’t fire them? That said, would you complain to your Realtor abour your lawyer not doing his or her job? With this last question, I show you why complaining to your MPP about administration is futile. The Realtor has no more responsibility over the lawyer, beyond writing the Agreement of Purchase and Sale any more than the MPP has responsibilty over the minister of the Crowns job beyond writing the Act of legislation. Like the Realtor, the MPP writes the contract. The lawyers, like the ministers of the Crown, are the ones to execute it.

While you might not be able to fire your elected representative, you certainly have should maintain a right to make reasonable demands of them, expecially when the demand is to fix a rule of law that violates fundamental rights.. However, not only does it appear we don’t know how to make these reasonabe demands in order to make an impact, we don’t do it, because many have lost sight of what the MPPs job is; the MPPs job is to make law.

Time is coming to put our power to the test. Time is coming to lay out our legal reasons to each of our MPPs as to why the Immunization School Pupils Act (ISPA), in whole or in put, needs to be abolished. The ISPA needs to be abolished in whole or in part for reason it is inconsistent with the provisions set out in the Constitution Act 1867, and is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.

The court ruled in Littlefield that a politician should not need to ask their consituents how to vote, however, it does not speak to MPPs. who. ignore the reasonable demands made by the residents, on record, of the MPPs constitutency which may go ignored,. Properly written, properly documented, it is reasonable to presume that any MPP who fails to resolve the issue with or on behalf of the consitutency after being properly notified on the public record, would be acting willfully and would have no leg to stand on should he or she attempt to claim good faith following being duly notified.

These arguments are likely novel in our lifetime, but new does not necessarily mean incorrect. In funcitonal law, like functional medicine, sometimes it is a matter of trial and error, until we get it right and get back our power.

Come back here often to watch for updates or subscribe to Amanda’s Substack for the announced launch of this campaign,.