January 27, 2023

The devil is in the details - truer words were never spoken.

As the research continues with linking both the characters and or public bodies to Canada’s Supreme Law, the Constitution Act 1867, it appears that it may possible to apply the Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960 with legislation itself, and in Ontario, starting with the Municipal Act 2001.

Before beginning the Constitutional links from the Constitution Act 1867 to the municipality, liberty will be taken with the term “municipality” and substituted, as required, with “Barrie” for the purpose of aiding the ease of understanding.

In Ontario, under Section 4, Municipal Act 2001, inhabitants of Barrie are incorporated as a body corporate.

Under Section 9, Municipal Act 2001, Barrie, and by nature and spirit would include any Part thereof, has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person for the purpose of exercising its authority under this or any other Act.

Take a moment…let that sink in.

Each inhabitant is incorporated, each inhabitant is incorporated as Part of Barrie;

WHEREFORE any Part of Barrie, (maybe You), under Section 9, Municipal Act 2001, has the capacity, rights, powers and privileges of a natural person […].

Apply those sections together with Section 92 (8), Constitution Act 1867 and it may be that easy to establish your Recognized and Protected Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms with the Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960.

If Betty is an inhabitant of Barrie, as an inhabitant of Barrie, Betty is Part of Barrie.

If Betty is One of the People of Canada, Betty is a Member of the People.

And the Constitution Act 1867 is the Supreme Law of Canada, pursuant to Section 52 (1), Constitution Act 1982.

WHEREFORE any Member of the People of Canada, including any Part of Barrie, or other municipality, of Ontario is a natural person, as recognized and established in Section 9, Municipal Act 2001, together with the provisions set out in Section 92 (8), Constitution Act 1867, and that natural person may at any time preserve and protect their individually Recognized and Protected Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms with the Canadian Bill of Rights, 1960.

If Betty owns a restaurant or fitness center, Betty owns property. As the established property owner, Betty is both surety and beneficiary of her property. In these capacities, Betty would have both legal and Lawful right, assured to her by the provisions set out in the Constitution, to fair and impartial administration of Justice, including but not limited to, the right to demand proof that Barrie has the Constitutional jurisdiction to infringe, abridge or abrogate Betty’s individual right to

i.      life;

ii.     liberty;

iii.   security of the person;

iv.   enjoyment of property; and

v.    not to be deprived thereof except by due process of law.

Betty could then establish Section 52 (1), Constitution Act 1867, to any public body or agent thereof, who may be trying to enforce any law that is inconsistent with the provisions set out in the Constitution is, to the extent of its inconsistency, of no force or effect; and

Betty could support that argument with MacMillan Bloedel Ltd v Simpson; and

Betty could then further back up that support with Section 1 (a), Canadian Bill of Rights 1960, because Betty’s argument is framed in a constitutional context, pursuant to paragraph 580, Meads v Meads.